-
Search IP Databases
- CIOPORA Copyright EPO EU EUIPO European Commission European Patent Office European Union Federal Circuit Goods and Services Industrial Designs Infringement innovation intellectual property Intellectual Property Rights International Registration invention IP Madrid Protocol Maier and Maier OHIM patent patents PCT trademark trade mark Trademarks USPTO WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization
- view all tags
-
April 2024 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun « Jan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
IP4all Weekly Bulletin
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
IP Basis®
IP Guide®
India
The Indian Patent Office has acquired online access to the International Bureau (IB)
Тhe IPO has issued a public notice dated July 2, 2012 notifying that the Indian Patent Office has acquired online access to the International Bureau (IB) of World Intellectual Property Organization. Thus the process of filing PCT National Phase Applications has been simplified, as the Applicant is now not required to file multiple copies of […]
Radico Khaitan Limited (“Radico”) claim rejected by Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court rejected Radico Khaitan Limited (“Radico”) claim for exclusivity over the numeral “8” under its registered trademark “8 PM”. The Court held that prima facie there exists no actionable similarity between Radico trademark “8 PM” (for whiskey) and Carlsberg India Private Limited trademark “PALONE 8” (for beer) and mere similarity in the manner […]
Appeal filed by Dhariwal Industries Ltd. and Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal dismissed by The Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal filed by Dhariwal Industries Ltd. and Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal (appellants) that raises questions of legality of an ex parte decree passed by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The trial court held that appellants do not have right to use the […]
Appeal filed by Dhariwal Industries Ltd. and Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal dismissed by The Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal filed by Dhariwal Industries Ltd. and Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal (appellants) that raises questions of legality of an ex parte decree passed by the trial court and affirmed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The trial court held that appellants do not have right to use the […]
Delhi High Court restrained usage of the business name ‘Tata Diamonds’
Considering ‘TATA’ a well-known trademark in addition to being registered, Delhi High Court restrained (i) the defendant from using the business name ‘Tata Diamonds’ or any other business name; (ii) the defendant from using the domain name www.tatadiamonds.com or any other web name; which would constitute infringement of the trademark ‘TATA’.
Considering ‘TATA’ a well-known trademark in addition to being registered, Delhi High Court restrained (i) the defendant from using the business name ‘Tata Diamonds’ or any other business name; (ii) the defendant from using the domain name www.tatadiamonds.com or any other web name; which would constitute infringement of the trademark ‘TATA’.