 The US Patent Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has issued its first precedential opinion in an AIA post-grant proceeding, Securebuy, LLC v. CardinalCommerce Corp., CBM2014-00035, Paper 12. Petitioner SecureBuy had filed a civil action seeking declaratory judgment, and had later petitioned for covered business method review (a process similar to post-grant review). The relevant statute, 35 U.S.C. § 325(a)(1), stated that a post-grant review could not be instituted if a civil action challenging the validity of the subject patent had been previously filed; however, the statute was unclear on whether it applied to the covered business method patent review process. The Board found that it did and denied SecureBuy’s petition.
The US Patent Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has issued its first precedential opinion in an AIA post-grant proceeding, Securebuy, LLC v. CardinalCommerce Corp., CBM2014-00035, Paper 12. Petitioner SecureBuy had filed a civil action seeking declaratory judgment, and had later petitioned for covered business method review (a process similar to post-grant review). The relevant statute, 35 U.S.C. § 325(a)(1), stated that a post-grant review could not be instituted if a civil action challenging the validity of the subject patent had been previously filed; however, the statute was unclear on whether it applied to the covered business method patent review process. The Board found that it did and denied SecureBuy’s petition.
source: Maier & Maier, PLLC
345 South Patrick Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
www.maierandmaier.com


















