Archive: 17 Aug 2012

It is not regarded as the use of a trademark for a name of an advertising character which is not used as an indication of the source of goods or services

It is not regarded as the use of a trademark for a name of an advertising character which is not used as an indication of the source of goods or services

The trademark in dispute A trademark “花太郎” (transliteration: Hua-Tai-Lang. A Japanese name)” designating the services of “restaurants” was allowed for registration inTaiwan. The complainant filed an opposition against the above trademark during its publication period according to the old Trademark Act, Article 23.1(14) by the reason that the complainant has used “花太郎” as a trademark […]

Since July 1, 2012, it is available to pay the trademark registration fee after the official due date

Since July 1, 2012, it is available to pay the trademark registration fee after the official due date

Before July 01, 2012, when an applicant unintentionally failed to pay the registration fee by the official due date, it was not allowed to restore the trademark right. Each year, there were about 2400 trademarks being lapsed due to failing to pay the registration fees because the applicants were out of the country, made a […]

The success in commerce of a product manufactured in accordance with a patent in dispute cannot prove that the patent in dispute meets the inventive step requirements

The success in commerce of a product manufactured in accordance with a patent in dispute cannot prove that the patent in dispute meets the inventive step requirements

A Utility Model patent related to “mold-proof patch” inTaiwanwas invalidated by a third party by the ground of “in lack of inventive step” according to the Patent Act, Article 94.4. The complainant (patentee) initiated an administrative action up to theIP Courtagainst the decision of the Appeal. One of the grounds claimed by the complainant was […]

A Utility Model patent related to “mold-proof patch” inTaiwanwas invalidated by a third party by the ground of “in lack of inventive step” according to the Patent Act, Article 94.4. The complainant (patentee) initiated an administrative action up to theIP Courtagainst the decision of the Appeal. One of the grounds claimed by the complainant was […]
    • August 2012
      Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
      « Jul   Sep &r aquo;
       12345
      6789101112
      13141516171819
      20212223242526
      2728293031  
  • IP4all Weekly Bulletin

    You can subscribe to the weekly IP4ALL Bulletin.

  • IP Consulting Ltd. - Intellectual Property Consulting Agency
  • Landmark-TP
  • Ivan Georgiev - Rembrand
  • Global IP Attorneys - The world's leading address guide for patent,  trademark, copyright, intellectual property and IP attorneys. In just a few steps you can find your agency for registration and protection of your intellectual property, patent, design, copyright or trademark.
  • The Professional Sector Network is a referral and networking group that caters exclusively to leading firms with a history of excellence in the business, advisory and investment sectors.
  • Online source of information for the events and developments in the field of intellectual property worldwide
  • Jobs in USA
  • Become our partners
  • IP Basis®

  • IP Guide®