Albanian Appellate Court Confirms Red Bull’s Win In Trade Dress Lawsuit Against Local Competitor

canIn March 2014, the Appellate Court of Tirana upheld the decision of the First Instance Court of Tirana in Red Bull’s trade dress lawsuit against the Albanian energy drink producer Arseni. This decision is now under appeal with the Supreme Court of Tirana.

In June 2012, Red Bull initiated a court proceeding on the ground that the defendant’s product design constituted an infringement of the plaintiff’s well-known trademark, as well as an act of unfair competition.

The Appellate Court upheld the reasoning of the First Instance Court, where various IP-related issues rarely heard and decided on by the Albanian courts were addressed during the proceedings, and answered in line with the CJEU’s rulings.

One of the issues that the courts looked into was the criteria for determining what constitutes a well-known mark and whether Red Bull marks are well known in Albania.

After carefully analyzing the evidence submitted by Red Bull showing that 97 percent of the Albanian public recognized the Red Bull Energy Drink mark, both courts acknowledged the well-known status of Red Bull marks in Albania, pointing out that this percentage is extremely high and that the marks have therefore attained sufficient awareness in order to pass the threshold of being well known.

The courts further stated that the blue/silver color combination and the trapezoid-like graphic solution is one of the most distinctive characteristics of Red Bull marks and that the marks have acquired distinctiveness through the extensive use in the Albanian market.

Another interesting ruling the courts rendered was the one related to common situations that involve with well-known marks, such as taking unfair advantage and being detrimental to the distinctive character of the mark or its reputation. After concluding that the Albanian legislation has fully transposed the Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 as well as the CJEU rulings put forward by the plaintiff, the Appellate Court confirmed that the CJEU rulings constitute an important guideline the Albanian authorities should follow.

Also, both courts satisfied the plaintiff’s unfair competition claim and ruled that the similarities in the packaging of the products, e.g. the size and shape, can be taken into account while estimating the confusion in the course of trade.

It is an interesting ruling, taking into account the total lack of the Albanian case law on unfair competition, and trade dress in particular. It should be noted that there is no legal definition of trade dress in the Albanian law; however, the trademark law and the unfair competition law provide legal basis for protection against copycat packaging or trade dress infringement, as both courts stated.

As the case law related to the enforcement of trademark rights is very limited in Albania, Red Bull’s recent win against the local importer is encouraging news for trademarks owners seeking to enforce their rights in Albania. The courts also showed willingness to follow the CJEU criteria, finding them to be an important guideline for the Albanian practice.

Even though the decisions of the First and the Appellate Court do not create judicial precedents in Albania, this particular decision is of great importance, as it paves the way for further consideration of the CJEU’s rulings by the Supreme Court.

    • February 2018
      Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
      « Jan    
       1234
      567891011
      12131415161718
      19202122232425
      262728  
  • IP4all Weekly Bulletin

    You can subscribe to the weekly IP4ALL Bulletin.

  • Recommended videoView all | 

    The new EU trade mark Regulation enters into force on March 23rd. As a result, the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) will change its name to the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

    The amending Regulation also revises the fees payable to the Office, including an overall reduction in their amounts, particularly in the case of trade mark renewal fees. On 23.3. 2016, the Office’s online application forms and fee calculator will be automatically updated to reflect the new system.
    From its base in Alicante, Spain, OHIM has processed more than 1.3 million Community trade mark applications in 23 EU languages, from nearly every country and region in the world, since 1996.

    The Amending Regulation was published on 24 December 2015 and is part of the EU trade mark reform legislative package that also includes the replacement of the existing EU Trade Mark Directive (Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and the Council).

    OHIM is the EU’s largest decentralised agency. It is entirely self-financed, receiving no funding from the EU Budget. As well as managing the Community trade mark and the registered Community design (RCD), it works in collaboration with the EU national and regional IP offices to build a stronger IP system across the EU for the benefit of users.

  • IP Consulting Ltd. - Intellectual Property Consulting Agency
  • Landmark-TP
  • Ivan Georgiev - Rembrand
  • Global IP Attorneys - The world's leading address guide for patent,  trademark, copyright, intellectual property and IP attorneys. In just a few steps you can find your agency for registration and protection of your intellectual property, patent, design, copyright or trademark.
  • The Professional Sector Network is a referral and networking group that caters exclusively to leading firms with a history of excellence in the business, advisory and investment sectors.
  • IP Basis®

  • IP Guide®

  • Become our partners